The Endellion Quartet first rehearsed on 20 January 1979, deep in the throes of Britain’s so-called “Winter of Discontent”. That longevity – with three of the original players still on the team after four decades – makes the acclaimed ensemble roughly as old as Spandau Ballet, and senior to REM. While fashions in pop, and indeed politics, may change with the seasons, the quartet has matured and developed without losing touch with the qualities of sensitivity and solidarity that still make for so many exemplary performances.
At 40, they now match the greatest age attained by the Amadeus Quartet – that band of immortals whose heavenly timbre sometimes comes to mind when you hear the Endellions. To shine as they should, they need the right setting, and the generously responsive acoustic of the Wigmore Hall has now hosted their richly intelligent music-making on – so cellist David Waterman said in a first-half speech – something like 100 occasions. He also remarked to a rousing cheer that, as you age, not only do the policemen appear young. Especially at the present moment, prime ministers and presidents start to look more “juvenile” than ever.
For their birthday gig, the Endellions typically programmed not a buffet of pleasing trifles but a substantial three-course meal which allowed them not a second for celebratory coasting. For starters, Haydn’s Op. 74 G minor Quartet – the “Rider” – cantered out of the stalls with an engaging mix of playfulness and gravitas. Soon enough the tender togetherness of the Endellion sound shone through, with Waterman’s cello – as throughout the evening – in the role of genial but rock-solid sheet-anchor. In the ravishing largo, Garfield Jackson’s honeyed viola soared and brooded, while an almost-stately minuet announced that this band has no need of breakneck tempos to make any cheap musical point. In the finale, suitably con brio, first violin Andrew Watkinson led a sort of nocturnal gallop in which the frolicsome syncopations of the scoring never quite threw off a hint of panic and chaos. The darkness and daring that the Endellions consistently find in Haydn looked forward to their restless exploration of the evening’s concluding work: Beethoven’s Op. 131 in C sharp minor.
Before we came to Haydn’s greatest musical progeny, however, we took a highly relevant detour into the shadowed and even spooky sonic landscape of Bartok’s Second Quartet. Composed in 1915-17, the work in its strenuous and haunting sonorities leaves no wiggle-room, and no place to hide, for any voice in the quartet. All sang out with the brooding intensity Bartok commands, with the lower strings especially resonant in the anguished passages that fill the moderato first movement. After that, the scherzo-like allegro is a fanciful and mesmerising creation, rooted in the composer’s 1913 field-trip in North Africa. Bartok packs it with driving, hypnotic motifs that recall some trance-like gnawaritual stretching deep into the night under a desert moon. Whether in the delirious unison passages, the crazy glissandi or stabbing pizzicato breaks, the Endellions delivered with a fierce commitment that went far beyond “orientalist” scene-painting. After this head-spinning excitement, the lento conclusion hits like a post-dawn comedown, comfortless and becalmed. The writing here eschews all showing off to leave each part naked and solitary; again, the Endellions brought lustre to the downer and passed Bartok’s test with flying, if muted, colours.
Only after the interval, as the Op. 131 quartet began, did the logic of the evening’s sequence really come into focus. Given the first-half selection, we could hear how Beethoven’s late masterwork not only builds on the past innovations of Haydn. It begins to open up dazzlingly fresh harmonic vistas that subsequent giants – Bartok not least among them – would extend and exploit. The Bach-like fugue began the work in a serene, otherworldly mood – with Waterman’s cello again as master of ceremonies – before a magic chromatic shift into the allegro, with its folksy bounce and lilt. In the half-dozen variations of the great andante theme, the Endellions seized the opportunity to showcase both individual flair and collective synchrony. One played for all, and all for one, as the four musketeers moved from the opening exchange between Andrew Watkinson’s and Ralph de Souza’s violins to the soulful viola-and-cello to-and-fro in the aptly marked “lusinghiero” – “seductive” third variation, with its shattering climax of wayward trills.
In the wild galop of the fifth, presto movement, the Endellions (pictured above) let us hear the joyful, slightly manic, laugh of Haydn’s delighted ghost. Ravishing lyricism from the violins in the bridging adagio prepared the way for a final allegro that, in its questing interrogations of the work’s opening fugue, avoided any hint of smug or smooth closure. To the last gasp, the Endellions’ four discrete and distinct voices pointed up contrasts and tensions rather than wrapping things up in a bland birthday bow. As a celebration concert, this anniversary bash had its serious – though never solemn – side. But the guests of honour inscribed their virtues of alertness, mutuality and integrity over every page. That was quite thrilling enough.
International Record Review March 2013 CD: Haydn Quartets [Warner Classics]
Many years have elapsed since I last heard the Endellion String Quartet, but nothing prepared me for the kind of perfection achieved in this stunning release. For one thing, the sound, even by today’s highest standards, is extraordinary. The overall perspective is close but free of any harshness, while yielding an impact that puts the Endellion squarely in one’s listening area, with each instrument clearly placed. Of course, this would be a relatively minor matter were the performances not worthy of such fine engineering. Fortunately, in every respect they are, especially in being free of musicians’ heavy breathing that has infected other close-range string-quartet recordings.
As with many of today’s performances, the impact of ‘period’ practices is evident while avoiding strict adherence to all of them. Pitch, for example, is modern. Grace notes, however, emerge on the beat rather than as decorative ornaments preceding it. What makes these performances so commanding is the taste and intelligence that shapes them. Tempos are superbly judged, fast movements remaining aptly animated while projected at a pace that permits clarity even in the most rapidly articulated passages. Slow movements are beautifully sustained, but never to the point that makes them seem static, and the Endellion is superbly balanced, each voice given its due
What is particularly interesting is Op. 20 No 4. Composed in 1772 it shines as one of his major achievements. Indeed, the six that comprise the Op. 20 set exemplify how the quartet genre stimulated Haydn’s imagination more fully, perhaps, than did any other one. Equally commanding is Op. 76 No. 1, dating from 1797, when Haydn was in the midst of his second London trip. With the Endellion, it gains a clarity and tension I have not heard in any other performance. This clarity is rooted in tempos that are a bit slower than one usually encounters, especially in outer movements. Yet one hardly notices this, in good measure because the group’s articulation is immaculate, even in the most rapidly articulated passages. The music’s occasionally brash assertions serve as a reminder of Haydn’s influence on Beethoven.
The ‘Lark’ Quartet, Op. 64 No. 5 (1790) may not be on the exalted level of the other two in this release, but, as heard here, it comes close. Its opening movement, Moderato allegro, boasts a relaxed ease complemented by brash eruptions that blend lyrical grace with explosive eruptions, conveyed with greater conviction by the Endellion than by any other ensemble I have heard. The two-and-a-half minute finale is a buoyant romp – a model of sophisticated perpetual motion at its most humorous.
This release is strongly recommended for those unfamiliar with this music or for others who collect multiple recordings of a given work. All of Haydn’s da capos in outer movements are observed. An Outstanding Release.
International Record Review, January 2009
By John Warrack
Beethoven String Quartets Warner Classics
The Endellion Quartet have given many Beethoven cycles in concerts during the 30 years of their existence… but only in 2005 did there begin to appear individual issues in what was heading for a complete Beethoven cycle (they were reviewed in these pages in October 2005 and March and November 2006). Now,the cycle is suddenly complete, together with quintets and quartet arrangements and other pieces that do not normally feature in a Beethoven cycle. Furthermore, the scores have been given a thorough revision by Jonathan Del Mar, hawk-eyed Beethoven editor now replacing, for Bärenreiter, the older editions with newly authenticated texts (as far as is possible, that is: Beethoven was a disobligingly inconsistent reviser of his scores, and ambiguities remain). For these reasons, as well as for the sustained quality of the performances, this is an impressive achievement. It has also been steadily well recorded: the players have a fairly close presence, with good balance between all four of them, and though three recording locations and four engineers over a period of four years are listed, the sound is remarkably consistent.
The Early Quartets: Op. 18
Despite their equivocal relationship, Haydn hovered as a powerful influence over Beethoven in his early Op. 18 set of quartets. No interpreters can escape this, whether in echoing Haydn¹s style and turns of phrase or in emphasizing where his truculent pupil was kicking over the traces.
String Quartet No. 3, probably, in fact, the first of the set that Beethoven composed, copies a Haydn harmonic trick by opening on a bare interval (A-G) intended to cause confusion about what key the music is in (D), and ends with another Haydn joke, fooling us about when the music has actually finished. So the work opens and closes with nods to Haydn¹s wit and the Endellions do well throughout to keep the manner light and the textures clear. Not until the Andante con moto do they use greater Romantic warmth of tone, making the staccatos which mark the second musical idea gentle and even lyrical by almost stroking them.
This early quartet tends to be rated less highly than its successors, and the Endellions sensibly pay respect to the Andante’s richness of texture while not laying too great an emotional burden upon it. They take the expressive Adagio of Op. 18 No. 1 gravely, and with a restraint that causes the violent outbursts near the end to sound the more shocking. As a fascinating addition to the cycle, the disc includes Beethoven’s original version of the work, which he later dismissed in favour of the more familiar one, since ‘only now have I learnt how to write string quartets properly’. Most composers would be happy to have written the discarded version, but Beethoven’s second thoughts undoubtedly produced a tauter, stronger and more dramatic piece. Yet they weren’t even exactly his second thoughts: sketches show that the original opening was actually his ninth attempt at getting right a theme whose toughness and versatility was what he was struggling to find for the music he wanted.
The Endellions’ sense of the contrasts in this set of six quartets serves them well. They have the length of phrase, deriving from a sure feeling for the harmony, to find the essential grace in the melodic lines of the opening movement of No. 4, while also having the wit to let the lightly ingenious counterpoint of the Scherzo almost veer into a waltz by the end; and then to succeed it by what must have then been the darkest minuet ever written. The light simplicity of No. 5 includes a rollicking performance of the fifth variation in the Andante, rougher than anything in Haydn and matching the ungainly bounds in the Scherzo of No. 1 in the set. The opening Allegro con brio of No. 6 possibly overstates the brio but they are brilliant in the Scherzo, with its bewildering rhythms: Beethoven’s time signature is 3/4 but much of the music is notated in 6/8, and the players produce just the right sense of heady confusion. Their doleful manner in ‘La malinconia’ anticipates later and darker emotions.
The Middle Quartets: the Razumovskys, Op. 74 and Op. 95
These emotions begin to gather and deepen with the quartets of what is usually described as Beethoven’s ‘middle period’. The six years after the Op. 18 set and before the Razumovsky Quartets of 1805-06 were filled with much, not least the first three symphonies and the first version of Fidelio, and one of the features of the expansion in Beethoven’s quartet style was the extra weight he gave to slow movements. The Endellions make sensitive differentiation in the Razumovskys between the Adagio of No. 1 – in which there are subtle contrasts of expressive vibrato or lack of it in the increasing richness of the textures – and then the mood of the other two slow movements. The sense of serenity they bring to the Molto Adagio of No. 2 (Beethoven specifically asks for ‘much feeling’) differs from their mysteriously inward mood in the Andante (‘quasi Allegretto’) of No. 3, and for that matter with the Adagio of the so-called ‘Harp’ Quartet, Op. 74. Here, commentators as well as performers have disagreed to a surprising extent as to whether the feeling is happy or unrelievedly sad. The Endellions give it a poignancy that, as before, intensifies with the expressive ornamentation of the theme.
Elsewhere in the Razumovskys, the Endellions extend the expressive range from Op. 18. In the Allegretto vivace of No. 1 they take the marking ‘sempre scherzando’ to mean not merely skittish but a detailed play of both textures and rhythm, very effectively before they plunge into the Adagio, and they perform the finale in a very open fashion after the complexities that have gone before. In No. 2 there is a delightful lilt to the Allegretto, with its clever cross-rhythms, and the gentle transformation of the Russian theme (one of Beethoven’s most affecting surprises) is apt preparation for a finale that benefits much more from the light touch it gets here than from grim forcefulness. On the other hand, in the fugal finale of No. 3 they go hell for leather, brilliantly.
Their performances can also accommodate such outbursts as the almost manic frenzy of the first violin¹s quasi-cadenza near the end of the opening Allegro over the ‘harp’ pizzicatos in Op. 74, as well as the passages in the opening Allegro con brio of Op. 95. This, Beethoven’s so-called ‘Quartett serioso’, is well described as ‘sparer in texture and … much more explosive in manner’ by Philip Radcliffe (in Beethoven’s String Quartets ¬ London; 1965 ¬ one of the best of such guides). It is a demanding work: the Endellions do well, with compact but lucid phrasing, to maintain tension and clarity, and with a toughness of rhythm in the Scherzo to make sense of Beethoven’s challenging instruction Allegro assai vivace ma serioso.
The Late Quartets
All players approaching Beethoven’s last quartets must be conscious of entering heil’gen Hallen, masterpieces which were once regarded as ‘repellently ugly’ or (by a mercifully anonymous French critic) ‘a tainted spring’ from which musicians drank at their peril, and are now taken to be some of the supreme achievements of one of the greatest of all musical minds. Yet solemn reverence is an unwise response. There are, certainly, movements as sublime as anything in the whole of Beethoven. The Endellions begin the Op. 132 ‘Heiliger Dankgesang’ of gratitude for recovery from illness gently, not too slowly, almost completely abjuring vibrato in the gravely intoning minims, and reserving their greatest inwardness of feeling for the final section (as Beethoven asks), before moving into the march movement as if it were a continuation into full health and energy. They play the Cavatina of Op. 130 as warmly as this song-like indication suggests, with a heavy burden of melancholy as the melody breaks up, beklemmt (‘oppressed’). ‘Never have I written a melody that affected me so much’, Beethoven said. Yet the work also includes a Presto which the players rightly take at breakneck speed, and in the German dance movement they understand that Beethoven is teasing his listeners by slipping the melody¹s natural rhythm across the bar-lines before finally breaking it up and throwing different bits of it around from player to player.
The quartets are, in fact, filled with the contrasts that marked Beethoven’s music early and became by the end of his life more extreme than ever. The Endellions in general seem to take the view that a light touch can often reveal more in serious music than a ponderous one, such as with their flowing performance of the Adagio of Op. 127, which they follow with the abrupt humour in the Scherzo that almost lurches into a wild dance. They also have the clarity to deal with the confrontations of the opening movement of Op. 130, when the opening Adagio bars recur seven times in the course of the movement only to be almost barged aside by the forceful Allegro, all against the background of traditional sonata form. They conclude the work with a tremendous performance of the Grosse Fuge, another study in contrasts (Beethoven’s replacement Allegro is separately recorded). The seven movements of Op. 131, the most unified yet varied quartet of the entire series, centre on the contrasts of the variations, one of Beethoven’s most extraordinary sets. He was absorbed by variation form all his life, and one might broadly say that he began his career treating a theme to decoration, continued by subjecting it to intensification (as in the Razumovskys and Op. 74), and in this last phase (as also with the piano sonatas and the Diabelli Variations) used the technique to explore the very essence of a theme. In Op. 131, astonishingly, we never actually hear the basic theme in its simplest form, but skilful playing gives it prominence through all its manifestations. It is a wonderful piece of composition, beautifully expounded here.
So to Op. 135: after Op. 131 in 1826, who could have foretold this return in the same year to the spirit of Haydn, albeit one marked by a creative lifetime’s experience? The Endellions do not play it as a rather more knowing member of Op. 18, but something more substantial, with the mere 54 bars of the Lento as intense as its more expansive predecessors, and the famous ‘difficult decision’ is confronted with mock-severity. Instead of ending the finale in high spirits, as most players do, they allow a certain ambivalence, perhaps even a faint wistfulness, to hover over the closing pages, however robust the final cadence.
This well-filled set of ten CDs is completed not only with some little-known fragments (including one completely unknown until 1999) but with the fine String Quintet of 1801, and two of the arrangements of his own music which Beethoven never cared much about making: his fairly straightforward transcription of the Op. 14 Piano Sonata for string quartet and a more elaborate rewriting of an early wind octet for string quintet. Interesting as these handsome bonuses are, it is on the full cycle of the quartets that interest must centre. The discs are neatly presented in a slim box … …
A single choice among the many recorded versions of Beethoven’s quartets is scarcely reasonable. There are complete cycles by the Amadeus, Alban Berg, Hungarian, Gewandhaus, Juilliard, Kodály, Fitzwilliam, Budapest, Vanbrugh, Italiano, Végh, Talich, Borodin, Bartók, Tokyo, The Lindsays, Emerson, Medici, Cleveland and Hagen, to name but 20. Long loyal to the Hungarian Quartet (EMI), but not having heard more than a few of the others all the way through, I am in no position to produce a single recommendation, nor would want to do so with such widely and deeply ranging masterpieces. Travelling the journey in the company of the Endellion Quartet has been a rewarding experience and has brought ever deepening admiration for these
The Times – 26 January 2004 Wigmore Hall
FOR 25 years the Endellion Quartet has been one of Britain’s leading chamber groups, giving elevated performances in the most unassuming manner. And for this anniversary concert, 25 years to the day since their first rehearsal, they were on that characteristic form, with a lofty programme and no birthday concessions until they came to their encore: a Birthday Ramble written for them by Annette Isserlis many birthdays ago, but still an amusing catalogue of string quartet gestures.
They opened with a work that has been central to their programming: one of Beethoven’s Razumovsky Quartets, Op 59 No 2 in E minor. Right from the questing opening they brought a big sound, plenty of definition and tonal depth — but that is not the only way they play. Responding to Beethoven’s mercurial genius, they supplied the quick changes from fiery drama to lyricism that occur in a matter of seconds.
Like all the best quartets, the Endellions perform as one yet have individual identities. Each of the players — Andrew Watkinson, Ralph de Souza, Garfield Jackson and David Waterman — made his own mark as the Beethoven unfolded its long movements, but especially in the Allegretto’s quasi-fugal treatment of the Russian theme. The slow movement was an intense outpouring, and the finale brought fleet-footed virtuosity.
Webern’s Five Movements for String Quartet, his early venture into atonality, revel in the possibilities of previously unheard string colours. The players gave a wonderfully concentrated account of these shadowy, shimmering pieces.
In a nice gesture, they invited the group’s founding second violinist, Louise Williams, back to join them as the extra viola player in Mozart’s String Quintet in G minor, K 516. It could hardly have been a happier performance, even though this is late Mozart at his bittersweet best: never really sunny, never tragic. All five players found the richness and heartfelt intensity of the work, while also bringing restraint to the Menuetto and dreaminess to the slow movement.
It was Webern who wrote that “quartet playing is the most glorious music-making there is”, and these musicians performed with a relish that explains their long success.
“Musical Opinion” 6 concert Beethoven Cycle at The Venue in Leeds –2004
“Did you manage to get a ticket for the Endellions” has been the chief topic of conversation at concerts in and around Leeds over the last six months, every remaining seat for their Beethoven Cycle of String Quartets having been quickly snapped up after the opening concert.
It had simply started life as an idea to bring more shape to the monthly series of chamber music concerts presented as part of the Leeds International Concerts Season, the move from the Civic Hall to the newly opened concert venue at the Leeds College of Music offering a chance to try something a little different.
You did not have to go far into the first programme to realise that the marriage between the Endellion String Quartet and The Venue was going to be something very special, the clarity that both engendered opening up the music’s texture as we have rarely experienced.
The art of presenting music is to persuade the listener that the most meticulously prepared performances are totally spontaneous, the Endellion achieving that objective throughout the Cycle, nowhere more so than in the Opus 95 Quartet that carries the name Serioso. As if just discovering a great score, the imposing dynamic range they brought to the music encapsulated in an awesome sense of drama the four minute opening Allegro.
That performance only reinforced the fact that the Endellion have four instruments that can form a seamless quality of tone, a feature that worked perfectly for Beethoven’s predilection in passing thematic material between the four parts, and in particular between the two violins and viola. At the lower end, David Waterman provided a firm and potent cello line, grasping those solo moments with playing of real distinction.
Of course, such masterworks have had to withstand so many differing views over the years; the later Quartets often being over-burdened with grief and angst, while the debt that Beethoven owed to Haydn in his Opus 18 set being so frequently thrust at us.
The Endellion went down neither road, presenting each score without personal interventions, a perfect example being with the third movement of Beethoven’s last Quartet which benefited so greatly from the understatement of the sorrow expressed, easing the jolt in mood to the finale’s sprightly gesture of happy defiance.
Technically, the playing throughout was difficult to fault, intonation, with rare exceptions, being in the centre of every note, the Quartet never sounding rushed, though many of the tempi were very quick. Nowhere was this more welcomed than in the closing movements of the Second and Third Rasumovsky Quartets, the mercurial fun bubbling with good humour as they whizzed along, the many dynamic shades of the Second adding to the merriment of its quizzical little theme.
To encapsulate the virtues of this complete Cycle, we should go to the performance of Opus 131. By the time he composed this score Beethoven was so profoundly deaf that the only sounds he could hear were those in his head. In that strange sense of isolation we have a work that passes through the many moods of his life, happiness in a short Presto abruptly changing to his final thoughts of anger and sadness. It is a score that can sound facile unless you have musicians who can unlock the doors to the changing moods. The Endellion’s wide range of colours searched and delved so deeply below the printed page that you emerged from the concert feeling emotionally drained, having been taken into the despondency of the composer’s mind.
We are promised a Schubert Season beginning this Autumn, when seats will no doubt be the hottest property in town.